2009 ANNUAL REPORT
PRODUCTION SCHEDULE
THE BIG PICTURE
Now Staff begins drafting assigned sections (see below and attached “Deadlines by Staff Member”)
2-19-10 Complete design and layout of Summary Report
3-8-10 Deadline for delivery of staff drafts to Carol
3-12-10 Fully assembled Report and Summary documents to Mary-Beth and LaVonne for final review
3-17-10 Assembled Report and Summary to Chief for comment
3-24-10 Chief’s comments due
4-1-10 Report and Summary to printer
4-8-10 Report and Summary received from printer
4-12-10 thru LaVonne and Mary-Beth brief commissioners, CRC members, selected
4-14-10 reporters
4-15-10 Public release of Report and Summary
MAIN REPORT (long version)—by topic heading
Message: Auditor – LaVonne (3-1-10)
Executive Summary – Constantin & Mary-Beth (3-8-10)
• 1st Draft by Constantin to Mary-Beth (3-1-10)
• Final Draft by Mary-Beth to Carol (3-8-10)
Chapter 1: Who We Are – Mary-Beth (1-22-10)
Powers, duties, responsibilities (maybe community satisfaction surveys and commendations)
Chapter 2: What We Do – Team effort
a. Working to Build Community Trust – Irene & Mary-Beth (2-1-10)
Outreach to community, electeds, cultural competency training
• 1st Draft by Irene to Mary-Beth (1-15-10)
• Final Draft by Mary-Beth to Carol (2-1-10)
b. Working with CRC – Derek, Carol, & Mary-Beth (2-1-10)
Role, authority, recruitment, accomplishments
• Workgroup summaries by Carol & Derek to Mary-Beth (1-22-10)
• Final Draft by Mary-Beth to Carol (2-1-10)
c. Receive Citizen Complaints – Constantin & Mary-Beth (2-15-10)
Overview of process, mediation, number of complaints, demographics of complainants, IPR case handling decisions (including reconsiderations), common allegations, rate & reason for dismissals, referrals to IAD
• Case data by Derek to Constantin (2-1-10)
• 1st Draft by Constantin to Mary-Beth (2-8-10)
• Final Draft by Mary-Beth to Carol (2-15-10)
d. Oversight of the PPB – Derek, Pete, & Mary-Beth (2-18-10)
Bureau options for handling citizen complaints (declination, mediation, SIO, administrative and criminal investigations); IPR oversight: review of declinations, SIRMs, force complaint debriefings, investigations (including participation), findings (including controverts), PRB/FRB presence; disciplinary actions imposed on C cases.
• Data by Derek to Pete (2-1-10)
• 1st Draft by Pete to Mary-Beth (2-8-10)
• Final Draft by Mary-Beth to Carol (2-18-10)
e. Appeals Received / Heard – Mary-Beth (2-8-10)
f. Bureau Initiated Complaints – Derek & Mary-Beth (2-15-10)
Ordinance, directives, PRB, FRB membership, IPR actions in 2009
• B-case data by Derek to Mary-Beth (2-1-10)
• Final Draft by Mary-Beth to Carol (2-15-10)
g. Civil Claims – Pete, Derek, & Mary-Beth (1-29-10)
• 1st Draft by Pete to Derek for data validation (1-18-10)
• 2nd Draft by Derek to Mary-Beth (1-21-10)
• Final Draft by Mary-Beth to Carol (1-29-10)
h. Policy Work w/ PPB – Derek, Constantin, & Mary-Beth (2-23-10)
Force TF followup report, force complaint data, Transit MOU (?), [CRC policy work, e.g., Disparate Treatment report probably should be covered above in the “Working with CRC section]
• 1st Draft by Derek to Constantin (2-15-10)
• 2nd Draft by Constantin to Mary-Beth (2-18-10)
• Final Draft by Mary-Beth to Carol (2-23-10)
i. Expert Review of OIS / In-Custody Deaths – Derek & Mary-Beth (2-5-10)
PARC report, Chasse RFP, data, FRB findings
• OIS/ICD and findings data by Derek to Mary-Beth (1-15-10)
• Final Draft by Mary-Beth to Carol (2-5-10)
Appendices – Derek & Mary-Beth (3-1-10)
• Outline of proposed content by Derek to Mary-Beth (2-8-10)
• Approval of proposed content by Mary-Beth to Derek (2-9-10)
• 1st Draft by Derek to Mary-Beth (2-22-10)
• Final Draft by Mary-Beth to Carol (3-1-10)
SUMMARY REPORT (short version)
Design and layout – Irene, Carol, & Mary-Beth (2-19-10)