15:05:17 .3

15:05:28 .

>> Okay.

15:05:31

Welcome everybody.

Thanks for being here this afternoon.

 

15:05:34 As I kind of mentioned from e-mails that I've gotten today

15:05:38 , notices from folks, we're going to be a pretty small

15:05:41 group.

And

15:05:44 we're mostly just going to do a quick check-in

15:05:48 and some Bureau updates.

To

15:05:51 kick things off, my name is

15:05:54 Jessica Conner.

I am the staff

15:05:59 to Portland Housing Advisory Committee and build

15:06:02 back.

We've got somebody else which is going to join

15:06:05 us.

Great.

Heather

15:06:08 .

Perfect.

Heather, Jill

15:06:12 , Anna, appreciate you very much.

So

15:06:15 it is an -- I appreciate everyone tak

15:06:18 ing the time to review the letter

15:06:22 .

Go over it.

I know it is tricky

15:06:25 .

An attempt to prioritize anything

15:06:45 .

We're just continuing.

At least for right now on the path

15:06:48 that we are.

That might change in the future

15:07:24 .

Lloyd has retired from the housing center.

 

15:07:27 And with that he's rolling off of PHAC.

Definitely

15:07:31 some some sincere congratulations to her.

I also

15:07:35 heard that

15:07:38 Kamici has moved some positions and is

15:07:41 doing some prioritizing.

And so they will

15:07:44 not be joining us.

Unfortunately

15:07:48 .

And, yeah, we've got a couple people that are just

15:07:52 out either on vacation or out sick today.

So that is why we're

15:07:55 a little bit of a small group.

And when it comes to staff.

 

15:07:58 If it hasn't made its way around to you yet

15:08:02 , Matthew Shabol

15:08:05 t is actually leaving the house Bureau.

He got

15:08:09 a position with the governor's office.

He'll be a housing

15:08:13 policy advisor there.

This will be his last week

15:08:21 .

So he won't be able to join us unfortunately also

15:08:24 this afternoon.

He's got four meetings scheduled at the same time.

 

15:08:27 So we definitely, it will be -- it is quite

15:08:30 a loss for

15:08:34 .

But quite the boon

15:08:37 for the governor and for the state

15:08:40 .

So we'll definitely miss him and will

15:08:43 wish him all the best

15:08:47 .

Anything else before I do a quick check-in about the

15:08:50 letter?

 

15:08:57 Great.

Knew that we were just going to be super efficient this afternoon

15:09:02 .

So the letter, I did get one

15:09:05 , only one change

15:09:09 .

Relatively small.

I think since

15:09:12 sending out the one last week,

15:09:15 and that was from Kymberly

15:09:19 .

And she was requesting that the --

15:09:22 there is the section that is promoting resiliency

15:09:25 .

And the bullet is "home repair for low

15:09:29 income

15:09:33 homeowners."

Her request was we

15:09:36 ad add and

15:09:39 qualified seniors.

That at her request.

And I look

15:09:42 to Heather, and

15:09:45 others to see if there is support there or anyone that would

15:09:48 like to suggest something different.

Aside from that, those are the

15:09:52 only notes that I got.

Great, thanks Heather

15:09:54 .

I see you in the chat.

Sounds great.

 

15:09:57 And if there is anything else related to the leather or

15:10:00 letter or any

15:10:03 other back/PHAC

15:10:06 related business anybody would like to bring up.

I'll just

15:10:09 open the floor

15:10:13 .

>> I've been doing this long enough that I should not find it

15:10:16 challenging.

But I find it hard to

15:10:19 advocate for a budget I haven't seen

15:10:23 and sign a letter of support asking people

15:10:26 to vote for something I don't know what we're asking for

15:10:29 .

And I guess the last time, you know,

15:10:32 things that just changed really quickly.

We just had a

15:10:36 brand new housing commissioner.

You hadn't yet met

15:10:39 with her.

Did we get any

15:10:42 guidance from her?

Do we have any sense of

15:10:46 whether what she's going to advocate for?

15:10:50

Or where P

15:10:53 HB is sitting in this strange sit/

15:10:56 county, kind of, showdown?

It is hard

15:10:59 to know what position to take and hard to advocate

15:11:02 for what, when we haven't seen anything.

>> Yes

15:11:08 .

Yeah, so again, I can appreciate that.

 

15:11:12 And it being a no cut,

15:11:15 no add year is kind of, you know,

15:11:22 -- it is just kind of asking for you know

15:11:25 current service level budgets.

So doing the things that

15:11:28 we've been doing all year

15:11:33 .

And I can't speak to the

15:11:37 city/county situation.

But I do know that, you

15:11:40 know, Molly has now had, you know, and the

15:11:43 executive level team, right, more introductions with the

15:11:46 commissioner's office and staff there

15:11:52 .

But I don't anticipate at this point that

15:11:55 we have clear direction from

15:12:00 Commissioner Rubio on the budget part itself.

And part of that

15:12:03 is because we are PHB,

15:12:06 is now in this

15:12:09 new cluster of bureaus

15:12:12 .

And the Mayor has, you know, the Mayor

15:12:15 pulled all the bureaus back, clustered them

15:12:19 into groups

15:12:22 .

And this is terrible that this is now being recorded, that

15:12:25 I'm failing to remember what the name of the Housing Bureau's

15:12:29 cluster is.

 

15:12:32 Community and economic --

15:12:35 we were in there with prosper Portland,

15:12:38 development services,

15:12:41 plains sustainability and PHB.

So I know

15:12:45 who we're in the pot with.

And I know

15:12:48 that the budget -- the potential

15:12:51 to ask for

15:12:55 new money potentially coming in March,

15:12:59 everyone I'm hearing is caveating this pretty

15:13:02 seriously.

Potentially getting us some new guidance in

15:13:05 March.

And if it is, then it will be

15:13:08 the Commissioner will need to

15:13:12 put forth a package

15:13:15 or packages that are in coordination and

15:13:18 alignment with each of those four agencies

15:13:26 .

So I know that's probably still a little vague because none

15:13:29 of us have had to really coordinate our budget

15:13:33 asks before.

You know, but they are

15:13:36 really attempting to get, you know, our bureaus aligned

15:13:39 .

So my hope is that we may

15:13:42 have some information to bring to PHAC

15:13:46 at the next

15:13:56 .

-- community and economic development, thank you very much.

 

15:13:59 Person put that in the chat.

So yes

15:14:02 , I'm hopeful that we will have some information to be able to

15:14:05 share in March.

I don't know the timing of it

15:14:11 .

But when and what we can, we will definitely

15:14:16 bring that, will be important for Molly to want

15:14:19 to bring that to this group as well

15:14:22 .

>> But did PHB actually submit something?

 

15:14:25 Like, are we -- we're -- is that the

15:14:28 letter in support of PHB's

15:14:31 requested budget.

>> Yeah, we will be submitting

15:14:35 a requested budget

15:14:38 .

I'm going to put you on the spot for a minute

15:14:43 angel if you don't mind, as your finance and account

15:14:47 ing manager.

Perhaps you can share maybe in a different

15:14:50 way or a better way what it is the Bureau is going to be submitting

15:14:53 as part of our request budget.

 

15:14:58 >> Hello everyone.

I'm ankle

15:15:05 angel landro

15:15:10 n, for the record

15:15:13 .

At this point what we're doing is balancing the

15:15:16 current service --.

So we're

15:15:20 not inserting any decision packages

15:15:23 or additional funding for particular purposes.

But we

15:15:26 have been working on

15:15:29 the sustainment

15:15:33 -- same expenditures that we have over time with

15:15:36 taking into consideration the inflation rates for the

15:15:39 next fiscal year

15:15:43 .

There is another memo from the Mayor

15:15:46 's office that we are waiting for more

15:15:52 guidance into packages in the coming

15:15:55 , I don't know, maybe next month, where we

15:15:58 are going to get more insight about how can

15:16:01 we ask for additional funding to request

15:16:04 for particular needs

15:16:08 .

Our central budget in all this I

15:16:11 think as well

15:16:15 .

It can add more information than I have.

 

15:16:18 But what we are doing at this point is we need to

15:16:21 resubmit a budget on the 26th and it is based on the

15:16:24 current service level with our current revenue

15:16:27 and current expenditure

15:16:33 .

Yung, do you want to add something?

>> No.

 

15:16:36 That's basically it.

I mean, yeah, when it comes

15:16:41 to Bureau's asking for additional general fund

15:16:45 money, we are working with the Mayor's office to

15:16:48 come up with guidance on that.

And

15:16:52 like angel

15:16:55 said, that will be coming out in the next couple

15:16:58 months.

But that is only concerned with additional general fund money

15:17:02 .

It is not concerned with any

15:17:05 of the bureaus, any other revenues or

15:17:08 expenditures.

So...

>> So everything

15:17:11 else is staying the same from last year

15:17:15 ?

15:17:18

>> That is for Angel for the bureau to answer

15:17:23 .

>> Yes, mainly yes.

I think that only

15:17:26 you addition that we are working at this point

15:17:30 is the money that we are going to

15:17:34 receive.

I don't know the

15:17:37 amount.

Amount the bureau going to receive for five

15:17:40 years.

I believe for fiscal year

15:17:44 '24 we are adding like

15:17:48 12 million

15:17:51 .

Trying the figure out how much money we're going to

15:17:54 receive for that purpose.

That is the

15:17:58 only thing that will be

15:18:01 different than the budget at this time.

 

15:18:10 >> So like, Jessie

15:18:13 , the anti-displacement program we are run

15:18:17 running in's Portland.

So we're still spending like 2-

15:18:21 $3 million on that program?

 

15:18:24 Last year we saw packages that described things

15:18:28 .

And they went through last year, they were -- I

15:18:31 thought they were one-year things.

But that means we're just going to

15:18:34 continue doing it this year too?

15:18:38

>> Well in this budget, fiscal year

15:18:41 '23, we have

15:18:45 $3.5 million that are coming from fiscal year

15:18:50 '22 or land bank

15:18:54 ing acquisition.

That is included in this budget.

I don't know if that

15:18:58 's what you are making reference to.

>> I don't think so

15:19:01 .

I mean that is helpful.

That's good to know

15:19:07 .

>> My understanding of the funds dedicate

15:19:10 ed to east Portland

15:19:14 .

>> 82nd avenue is the one I meant.

>> Oh,

15:19:18 82nd avenue.

>> I misspoke.

>> No problem

15:19:21 .

So the American rustic

15:19:24 land local relief funds for

15:19:27 82nd avenue, there was

15:19:31 a coordinated -- three coordinated

15:19:34 , yet separate, requests

15:19:37 from prosper Portland, the Housing Bureau

15:19:41 and bureau of transportation.

All

15:19:45 around the 82nd Avenue cord

15:19:48 corridorrer

15:19:52 corridor.

Those went to council.

The decision around those

15:19:55 three packages was to repackage them as one

15:20:02 .

And shrink the fund

15:20:05 ing.

And then the three agencies were direct

15:20:10 ed to work together

15:20:13 to use those funds

15:20:17 in some sort of combination to address those

15:20:21 same needs.

So we asked for

15:20:24 funds.

We did get a yes.

But we got a little bit

15:20:27 less, and it required us to sort of reorganize the

15:20:31 way we were looking at it.

I am actually currently

15:20:36 the lead, at least on the PHB side

15:20:39 , for those funds.

And for that program.

 

15:20:44 We took that money,

15:20:50 $1.8 million, approximately

15:20:54 $1.8 million.

And a portion of that, about

15:21:01 $640,000 went to Prosper Portland for small business stabilization

15:21:04 program.

And the remainder is being coordinated.

 

15:21:07 It is still at H happy

15:21:10 PHB.

But we're work

15:21:13 ing closely with PBOT

15:21:16 and prosper.

And we're going to do a pilot

15:21:20 program around stabilization and workforce training.

>> That was one-

15:21:23 time money.

So that is not being reneweds

15:21:26 in the budget?

>> Correct.

All of the money is one time.

 

15:21:33 >> Okay.

And the three and a half million, the

15:21:36 land acquisition money that was in last year's budget

15:21:40 , I don't think that's been allocated it or has it been

15:21:43 ?

15:21:50

>> It has not been allocated.

But it is not

15:21:53 general fund money.

So it is in

15:21:57 our fund.

So basically it is there.

 

15:22:00 So if we need to carry forward to the next

15:22:03 fiscal year

15:22:07 .

>> So it will just roll forward.

We won't get

15:22:12 another three and a half million.

>> Well if you are -- if we are

15:22:15 not going to spend it, we are going

15:22:18 to add it.

If and

15:22:21 And we're going to spend it

15:22:26 .

What I'm starting to say is it is not

15:22:29 general fund.

That means if we do not spend it

15:22:32 , we are not going lose it.

So we have it.

It is in our

15:22:36 -- it is one of our funds.

So to be a specifically

15:22:40 is in the housing investment fund

15:22:43 .

 

15:22:48 >> Okay.

>> Does

15:22:51 that make sense?

So when we ask for general

15:22:54 fund requests, those

15:22:58 are, kind of, use it or lose it.

And then

15:23:01 when we're talking about the funds

15:23:05 that Angel is talking about, talk tacts

15:23:08 Housing Investment Fund.

It is okay that we just plop it

15:23:11 into that savings account or whatever and spend it when we need

15:23:14 it.

>> In other words --

>> But it is not -- but I

15:23:17 see that point you are saying

15:23:21 .

That it is the same base

15:23:25 level that I'm going to also look to Angel to

15:23:28 correct me if I get this wrong.

The

15:23:32 same service level does not include the extra

15:23:35 money stuff that we asked for from last year

15:23:38 .

We asked for 2 million for XYZ

15:23:41 program, our current service

15:23:44 level budget does not include

15:23:48 the -- getting the $2 million again

15:23:51 for the XYZ program.

>> That is correct.

 

15:24:05 >> Okay.

I don't have any

15:24:09 other questions.

Thank you.

>> Questions from any of the

15:24:12 other members?

 

15:24:27 Okay.

The next for the

15:24:30 letter.

So I will --

15:24:33 at this point I only need to take the watermark off

15:24:37 .

But finalize the letter.

I will send it over to

15:24:40 our finance county team for their

15:24:43 inclusion in our submitted

15:24:46 request budget.

>> And I would like to clarify

15:24:51 about the I insect pond

15:24:54 ing I was mentioning earlier before.

Basically

15:24:57 this is a new ponding that it is not being completed

15:25:01 .

The interagency agreement.

So

15:25:04 basically we are working with some estimates.

And because that is

15:25:07 coming from another bureau.

That means that we need

15:25:11 to balance the revenue and expenditures with

15:25:14 that bureau.

So we are getting those details to

15:25:17 make sure how much we are going to add in fiscal

15:25:21 year '24 budget.

Our initial estimate

15:25:25 is approximately $12 million.

But we need to make

15:25:28 sure that another bureau has the same numbers, because we need

15:25:32 to balance.

 

15:25:36 >> Thank you for that clarification, Angel.

 

15:25:44 Well, anything for the good of the order?

 

15:25:52 Comments, questions about anything related to the budget?

 

15:25:58 Or anything related to the bureau

15:26:01 ?

 

15:26:07 All right.

Well, lots of gratitude to

15:26:10 all of you for taking the time this

15:26:13 afternoon, and the time you took with the letter

15:26:16 .

I appreciate that.

 

15:26:20 We will be in touch

15:26:24 .

When we get back

15:26:27 guidance.

And I look forward to see

15:26:30 ing you all in March for our March

15:26:34 March 7th meeting.

 

15:26:37 >> Thank you.