|
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
---|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
CENTRAL CITY FDG (2003) + LLOYD SDG (1991) |
|
PROJECT NAME: 1510 NE Multnomah |
|
16-291413 DZM |
8 |
DATE: March 5, 2018 |
|
PROJECT ARCHITECT: Dave Otte, HOLST |
|
$75 million |
9 |
CONTEXT |
STAFF |
COMMISSION |
10 |
+ / - |
Comments |
+ / - |
Comments |
11 |
A1: Integrate the River |
+ |
|
|
|
12 |
|
A1-1: Connect Public Facilities to the River |
+ |
|
|
|
13 |
A2: Emphasize Portland Themes |
+ |
|
|
|
14 |
A3: Respect the Portland Block Structures |
+ |
|
|
|
15 |
|
A3-1: Support a Convenient Pedestrian Linkage Through the Superblocks
Between Convention Center and Lloyd Center |
+ |
|
|
|
16 |
|
A3-2: Make Superblock Plazas Inviting and Easily Accesible from
Holladay Street |
+ |
|
|
|
17 |
A5: Enhance, Embellish & Identify Areas |
+ |
|
|
|
18 |
|
A5-1: Develop Identifying Features |
+ |
|
|
|
19 |
|
A5-2: Accommodate or Incorporate Underground Utility Service |
+ |
|
|
|
20 |
|
A5-3: Incorporate Works of Art |
NA |
|
|
|
21 |
|
A5-4: Incorporate Water Features |
+ |
|
|
|
22 |
|
A5-5: Use Public Right-of-Way Design Criteria Established for
the Lloyd District |
+ |
|
|
|
23 |
|
A5-6: Incorporate Landscaping as an Integral Element of Design |
+ |
|
|
|
24 |
|
A5-7: Integrate the Civic Campus into the Lloyd District |
NA |
|
|
|
25 |
|
A5-8: Integrate the Lloyd Shopping Center into the Lloyd District |
+ |
|
|
|
26 |
A6: Re-use, Rehabilitate, Restore Buildings |
NA |
|
|
|
27 |
A9: Strengthen Gateways |
NA |
|
|
|
28 |
|
A9-1: Provide a Distinct Sense of Entry and Exit |
+ |
|
|
|
29 |
C1: Enhance View Opportunities |
+ |
|
|
|
30 |
|
C1-1: Integrate Parking |
+ |
|
|
|
31 |
|
C1-2: Integrate Signs |
NA |
|
|
|
32 |
C4: Complement the Context of Existing Buildings |
- |
Volume & material distinction of prior design was very clear and
contextually responsive to both neighborhoods. The current design
that blends the materials and design elements muddle the distinct
massing and form, which is fairly strong on its own. The three
buildings are all very similar and some variation in color or
material would respond to the different adjacent context of the
north and south properties. |
|
|
33 |
PUBLIC REALM |
STAFF |
COMMISSION |
34 |
+ / - |
Comments |
+ / - |
Comments |
35 |
A4: Use Unifying Elements |
+ |
|
|
|
36 |
A7: Establish and Maintain a Sense of Urban Enclosure |
+ |
|
|
|
37 |
A8: Contribute to a Vibrant Streetscape |
+ |
|
|
|
38 |
|
A8-1: Incorporate Active Ground Level Uses in Parking Structures |
NA |
|
|
|
39 |
B1: Reinforce and Enhance the Pedestrian System |
+ |
|
|
|
40 |
|
B1-1: Protect Pedestrian Areas from Mechanical Exhaust |
+ |
|
|
|
41 |
|
B1-2: Incorporate Additional Lighting |
+ |
|
|
|
42 |
|
B1-3: Design Projects to Attract Pedestrians to the Broadway/Weidler
Corridor |
+ |
|
|
|
43 |
B2: Protect the Pedestrian |
+ |
|
|
|
44 |
B3: Bridge Pedestrian Obstacles |
+ |
|
|
|
45 |
|
B3-1: Provide Pedestrian Crossings Spaced at Traditional One-Block
Intervals |
+ |
|
|
|
46 |
|
B3-2: Improve Pedestrian Crossings on NE Broadway |
NA |
|
|
|
47 |
B4: Provide Stopping and Viewing Places |
+ |
|
|
|
48 |
B5: Make Plazas, Parks & Open Space Successful |
- |
ground floor residential units facing the northern plaza and lack
of direct access to retail spaces will impact vitality of the
space and feel more privatized. Although specific users are
identified for the series of plaza spaces, they lack individual
character. |
|
|
49 |
B6: Develop Weather Protection |
- |
minimal along western side of the southern building and at the
southern retail end of the middle building |
|
|
50 |
|
B6-1: Provide Pedestrian Rain Protection |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
---|
51 |
B7: Integrate Barrier-Free Design |
+ |
|
|
|
52 |
C3: Respect Architectural Integrity |
NA |
|
|
|
53 |
|
C3-1: Design to Enhance Existing Themes in the Broadway/ Weidler
Corridor |
NA |
|
|
|
54 |
|
C3-2: Orient Development Along the Lloyd District's Eastern Edge
Toward Adjacent Neighborhoods |
- |
Volume & material distinction of prior design was very clear and
contextually responsive to both neighborhoods. The current design
that blends the materials and design elements muddle the distinct
massing and form, which is fairly strong on its own. The three
buildings are all very similar and some variation in color or
material would respond to the different adjacent context of the
north and south properties. |
|
|
55 |
C6: Develop Transitions Between Buildings & Public Spaces |
- |
the deep landscape planter along the edge of the retail facing
the northern plaza is a barrier to activating the space. While
the residential walk-up units facing the northern plaza provide
an up and back transition they front on to a narrow public walkway
that will be highly used and result in a space that is uncomfortable
for pedestrians and needs to be defended by tenants. |
|
|
56 |
|
C6-1: Step-Back Upper Building Floors Along Holladay Street |
NA |
|
|
|
57 |
C7: Design Corners that Build Active Intersections |
+ |
|
|
|
58 |
C8: Differentiate the Sidewalk Level of Buildings |
+ |
|
|
|
59 |
C9: Develop Flexible Sidewalk Level Spaces |
+ |
|
|
|
60 |
C10: Integrate Encroachments |
+ |
|
|
|
61 |
|
C10-1: Use Masonry Materials |
+ |
|
|
|
62 |
|
C10-2: Design Exterior Building Walls That Are Transparent in
Glazed Areas and Sculptural in Surface |
+ |
|
|
|
63 |
|
C10-3: Use Light Colors |
- |
red brick of previous design has changed to dark grey brick (manganese
ironspot) |
|
|
64 |
C11: Integrate Roofs and Use Rooftops |
+ |
|
|
|
65 |
C12: Integrate Exterior Lighting |
+ |
|
|
|
66 |
C13: Integrate Signs |
NA |
|
|
|
67 |
QUALITY AND PERMANENCE |
STAFF |
COMMISSION |
68 |
+ / - |
Comments |
+ / - |
Comments |
69 |
C2: Promote Permanence & Quality in Design |
+ |
|
|
|
70 |
|
C2-1: Maximize View Opportunities |
+ |
|
|
|
71 |
C5: Design for Coherency |
+ |
|
|
|